agriculture

MAXWELL BRINGS SIGNIFICANT HONOR

This story originally appeared as a V-M Viewpoint in The Vidette-Messenger on March 12, 1970.

A 35-year-old Morgan Township resident has brought significant honor to local agriculture and to Porter County.

Phillip A. Maxwell, who lives on Indiana 49 a mile south of U. S. 30, has just been acclaimed as Indiana Jaycees’ 1970 Outstanding Young Farmer. The award stamped the former Morgan Township High School athlete as the best in the state among an imposing entry list of 17 other statewide Jaycee club preliminary winners.

As recipient of the Indiana Jaycees OYF award, Maxwell will now represent the state at a national contest in Belleville, Ill., April 5 through 8, a distinct honor for any young man.

Winner of the local Jaycees’ first OYF award earlier this year, the judges at that time demonstrated their choice of Maxwell was no accident. This young farmer “works at his trade.”

To be eligible as a nominee for local, state, and national competition, participants had to be between 21 and 35 years of age, and derive a minimum of two-thirds of their income from farming.

Judging was done on the basis of progress in agricultural careers, soil, and natural resources conservation, and civic and social contributions to community, state, and nation.

The Porter County entry filled all these requirements admirably.

(Phil) was born into a farming family and was reared on the homestead he now occupies. Not content with getting by with the practical aspects of farming he had learned throughout his boyhood, Maxwell went to Purdue University, where he obtained a BS degree in animal husbandry.

In the 10 years he has solely operated a farm, Maxwell has consistently tried new ways to increase his profits. This includes a switch from dry to liquid fertilizer, for corn and beans; planting corn on unplowed ground; use of chemicals; and narrow plantings.

And, this young man has a goal; to expand hog production by investing in new buildings and automation.

Maxwell, operator of 1,130 acres of land, of which 1,053 are tillable, says he is farming “because I believe I can contribute more to a rural community, and feel there is no better place to raise a family and live a wholesome family life.”

He is raising a family, Cheri, 10, Debra, 8, and Mark, eight months, with his wife, the former Jane Smoker, of the prominent Wanatah area farming family.

His farming innovations hav been definite contributions to Porter County’s rural community.

Winner of the first two plateaus in local and state competition, Maxwell now goes on to the national event and possibly more honors next month.

He will take with him the best wishes of Valparaiso, Porter County, and the entire state.

March 6, 1976: Mechanical Revolution Alters Country Way Of Life More Machinery, Increased Yields Cut Farm Numbers

Originally published in The Vidette-Messenger of Porter County on March 6, 1976.

Mechanical Revolution Alters Country Way Of Life

More Machinery, Increased Yields Cut Farm Numbers

By JACK AYLESWORTH

THE LAST CENTURY has seen far greater change in American agriculture than all of the previous centuries combined. We have seen the transformation from muscle powerーboth animal and humanーto motor power. As a direct result of this shift, U.S. farmers have increased their productivity to a point never before reached.

In Colonial times almost everyone was a farmer by necessity, since a farmer produced little more than enough to feed himself and his family. By 1950, one farmer produced enough food and fiber for himself and 15 other people. By 1976, his productivity had increased to a point where he produced enough for 51 people.

As farm worker productivity increased, the number of farmers decreased. In 1920 Porter County had 1,791 farms. In 1973, there were only 661 farms.

THE REFINEMENT of the internal combustion engine made its application for farm power more useful. Whereas the first common gasoline (or kerosene) tractor pulled two 14-inch plows at about three miles an hour, the large 1976 models can pull 10 16-inch plows at six miles an hour. This is a tenfold increase in the amount of production from the operator.

Even greater increase has been made in harvesting. When corn was harvested by hand, it took a man with better than average ability to harvest 100 bushels of corn per day. With today’s large combine, one man can harvest 9,000 to 10,000 bushels in one day. This is a hundredfold increase.

The changes in farming from muscle power have altered life on the farm in many ways. No longer is it necessary for neighbors to join with each other to go from farm to farm threshing wheat and oats, shredding corn, filling silos, sawing wood for winter fuel, butchering hogs and cattle for meat, and raising barns. Each farm is more nearly self-sufficient with regard to labor.

IN THE EARLY 1900s, livestock, dairy products, and grain were the major items of farm output in Porter County. In 1976, farmers in this area raise mostly corn and soybeans.

In the late 1930s and early 1940s, electric power lines spread along almost every county road in Porter County, bringing modern conveniences to both the farmer and his wife. More replacement for muscle power.

The Federal Rural Electrification Administration permitted groups of farmers to farm cooperatives to build lines and bring electricity to isolated areas where public utilities did not find it economically feasible to provide service. The REA provided low interest loans for construction and cooperatives purchased their electricity from public utilities. Electricity was a major factor in enabling farmers to shell, dry, and store corn in large quantities.


NO STORY OF AGRICULTURAL progress is complete without credit being given to the role played by the land grant colleges such as Purdue University. In 1862, under Abraham Lincoln’s presidency, grants of public land were made to finance construction of agricultural and engineering collegesーone in every state. Most of the grants were for western land and the property was sold to gain funds for colleges in other states. These schools not only educated engineers, farmers, and farm leaders, but they also performed research on all phases of agriculture.

The County Agricultural Agent serves as a vital link connecting the research being done at Purdue with the practical application on the commercial farm. He advises farmers to test their soil and use proper amounts of plant food, to use improved tillage practices, to use new varieties of crops and livestock, and to form their own organizations such as the Farm Bureau and cooperatives.

One of the most important products of education and research at the land grant colleges was the development of hybrid corn. This probably doubled the corn production in the U.S. and it is proving to be a valuable export. One of the pioneers in the production of hybrid seed corn was Porter County's own George Chester who applied Purdue research at the commercial level and who produced and sold hybrid corn for many years under the name of Chester Hybrids.

Emil Kuehl was photographed before 1920 using horse-drawn corn planter on his Morgan Township farm. Photo loaned by Vernon Dinse.

Emil Kuehl was photographed before 1920 using horse-drawn corn planter on his Morgan Township farm. Photo loaned by Vernon Dinse.

Jan. 23, 1931: 500 FARMERS TOLD ‘COMBINE’ IS ONLY HOPE

Originally published in The Vidette-Messenger of Porter County on January 23, 1931.

500 FARMERS TOLD ‘COMBINE’ IS ONLY HOPE

Manager of Association Says Over-Production and Depression Have Brought Price Tumble.

DEFENDS POLICIES OF DISTRIBUTORS

BY STEWART LEAMING (Agricultural Agent)

A vivid Pickett picture of the struggle of organized dairymen do you maintain a fair price for fluid milk against overwhelming odds in the form of rapidly mounting production and greatly restricted conception depicted by Don E. Geyer, secretary-manager of the Pure Milk Association, held some 500 Porter and LaPorte county farmers spell bound for an hour and a half Thursday afternoon at the annual meeting of pure Milk District 16, held in Valparaiso.

Tracing the history of the present milk association from its inception, Geyer pointed out that in a few years that organization had been able to bring order out of chaos by bringing some 720 independent distributors in 18,000 producers into an effective machine for supplying the consumer with milk .

At this point he made it clear that the Pure Milk organization is most democratic; that all of its decisions have been made by an overwhelming majority of the directors who in turn are selected by the membership. "Policies of the organization are not left in the hands of the manager or any other paid employee," Geyer declared, “And the decisions represent the best thought of the membership.”

The speaker declared that if any error had been made it had been in setting the base price too high following the so-called milk strike of 1929.This stimulated production to an enormous extent and while the association has been successful in prevailing upon distributor is to absorb more milk than their actual requirements, the condition could not go on indefinitely. The increase in production, he explained, continued steadily in spite of the worst industrial conditions in the memory of present-day producers and this brought about a steadily decreasing consumption of the product. Cheap milk has been offered all over the United States. One by one the great consuming centers were forced to drop the retail priceAnd this back produced a psychological condition which made the cut on the Chicago Market inevitable.

In answering the charge that the whole force of the cut had fallen on the farmer, Geyer declared that the distributors had long been bearing part of the burden by observing more base than they could market. “Why were not the drivers forced to bear part of the cut?” Is frequently asked, the speaker stated, in pointing out the difference between the Milk association and a labor union. The task of the Pure Milk association is to find an outlet for every pound of milk produced by all its members every day. The labor union maintains the wage, but does not guarantee a job for its members. When business slackens, some of the members find themselves out of work, but the dairyman has a market every day. “If our membership wants us to operate on the principle of a labor union, we will maintain the price all right, but it can be brought about only by shutting members off the market."

In defending the recent decision of the price arbitrator, Dr. Clyde King, Geyer  stated that if the members are dissatisfied the whole matter can be reopened on 24 hours notice. “Where is the dairyman that dares to stay that the matter should be reopened,” thundered Geyer, and no voice took issue with him. By silence at least the membership approved the action of its directors under the stress of the circumstances.

The speaker scored members who spoke slightingly of their organization and started rumors not based on facts, and denounced them as traitors to the whole farming profession. One of the most common charges that has been made, he asserted, is that dealers are buying milk at Surplus prices and bottling it for the retail trade. “If any man has this idea, let him come to our offices and we can prove to him that dealers are taking more bass milk than they are selling as fluid,” Geyer declared. “We have complete records on every distributor and know that anyone who makes such a charge is not familiar with the facts.”

As to the financial operations of the association, he invited any member in good standing to inspect the records. “No Commercial concern throws its records open to outsiders,” he declared, but stated that any  authorized person could receive an accounting of every penny spent since the work started and that monthly statements of receipts and expenditures are sent to every local officer.

At the dairy school held in the morning, Prof. E.A. Gannon of Purdue gave a complete picture of the development of the dairy situation. “When a man goes into farming he must have a large enough income to maintain a certain standard of living. Many a man starts with very ordinary cows and as increased demands, upon him he simply adds to his cow herd. Too many unprofitable cows has brought about an overproduction as well as a low income. The solution, he declared, is fewer cows and more attention to their management. Plenty of legume roughage is the basis of an effective dairy ration, you stated and said that Northern Indiana was suffering from the lack of a greater acreage of clover, alfalfa and soybean hay. Homegrown feeds, supplemented with white linseed, cottonseed or soybean meal were stressed by the speaker.

“Present-day methods of cattle breeding are Obsolete and must be revised,” was the startling statement of Mr. Gannon. the use of proven bowls, those whose daughters have proved their ability to produce, is the only rational method of herd Improvement. “Too many bulls have been bought from breeders who have maintained show herds under show surroundings and where cows have been forced for record-making purposes and this has been the bane of the purebred business.As a result many breeds of dairy cattle have gone backwards in the past 10 years. The proven sire method, however, has improved all herds in which it has been used.

At the afternoon meeting Glen organ was unanimously nominated as District Director.

Dec. 1, 1930: F. W. SIEVERT OF PORTER GIVES INTERESTING FACTS ON BEE HIVE “BEESNESS”

Originally published in The Vidette-Messenger of Porter County on December 1, 1930.

F. W. SIEVERT OF PORTER GIVES INTERESTING FACTS ON BEE HIVE “BEESNESS”

(BY JEROME KENNY)

PORTER, Dec. 1.ーF.W. Sievert , local confectionary and cigar store owner, has a unique recordーhe has eaten honey every day for the last sixty-two years. M. Sievert is a beekeeper and he certainly believes in his honey as a healthful and excellent food.

Since he was a youth of fourteen and living on a farm a mile west of here the local man has followed his hobby of keeping bees. Mr. Sievert now has 100 hives which he keeps on a hillside farm near the site of Port Williams.

“When we were kids,” says Mr. Sievert, “we used to open the hives regularly and look in, but we never knew what we were looking for. Beekeeping has changed much since that time. At least we know what to look for now.”

In following his hobby for a great many years, the experience has taught him much, Mr. Sievert has become an authority on all phases of bee culture. He is well known at meetings of apiarists and his advice is sought by many beginners in the business.

A few days ago Mr. Sievert began packing his bees for the winter. This winter he is trying out a theory that is radically different from the usual practice in beekeeping. The bees will be left outside this year instead of putting them in a sheltered place such as a basement. This will allow them to adjust themselves to the changing temperatures better, explained Mr. Sievert.

At this time of the year the bees are getting ready to survive until spring and warm weather on the honey that they stored up this summer. The bees this year, Mr. Sievert explained, went into winter quarters with a good many young bees.

“The breeding of bees depends largely upon the amount of nectar available to make money, and this year there was little or no food for the bees until fall,” he says.

Most of the honey was obtained from the fall flowers. The yield this year averaged slightly more than fifty pounds per hive. Yield sometimes goes to over 200 pounds per hive, if the weather is favorable.

Although fall honey is considered the better in food value the American public prefers the summer honey which is lighter in color. The summer honey is gathered from clover or basswood while the later product is a combination of the nectar of all the fall flowers.

During the winter only the queen bee and the workers exist. All the drones, or male bees are killed off by the workers so that the food supply will hold out. The bee colony is not a socialistic community.

Even though the workers are not as large as the male bee they are able to kill him off by using strategy. When the drone tries to eat the workers annoy him and he doesn’t get enough to eat. Eventually he is so weakened by starvation that the worker is able to sting him to death. He is then carried outside of the hive.

There is a great amount of justifiable “beeicide.” a colony with 200,000 members during the summer will have only 80,000 left during the winter. This number is greatly augmented during the advent of warm weather.

On March 15 or 20 the breeding season begins. The queen lays about 150 eggs a day. In April she increases her output to 5 to 6 hundred per day and by June she is in the height of production with 3,000 eggs per day. She continues at this rate until about Nov. 1.

According to Mr. Sievert the egg quantity is dependent upon the honey supply and a good keeper will provide his bees with all they can eat. Likewise it is essential that the swarming should be controlled scientifically. There should be plenty of room to swarm.